Supervision Relationship: Adaptation of the S-SRQ in Argentine Psychotherapists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.13.3.5Keywords:
Supervision Relationship, Supervision Measures, Psychotherapy, Adaptation, Clinical Supervision, Clinical Psychology, Psychology Supervision, Psychotherapy Supervision, Psychotherapy ResearchAbstract
Introduction: In recent years the significance of evaluating clinical supervision and its role in the psychotherapeutic process has been recognized. However, there are few instruments for such evaluation, particularly in Latin America. This study aimed to adapt the three-dimensional (reliable basis, reflexive education and structure) Short Version of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (S-SRQ) to Spanish. Method: The questionnaire was administered to 374 Argentine psychotherapists (non-probabilistic sample). The S-SRQ was translated and retranslated to its original language. It was performed internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), dimensional (parallel and confirmatory factor analysis), and item analyzes (standardized coefficients and item-scale correlation). Results: The internal consistency coefficients were adequate for the total scale and, in general, for each dimension. The dimensional analyses were adjusted to a three-dimensional model, reliable basis, reflective education and structure. Item performance was good in relation to the total scale and each dimension. Discussion: The psychometric performance of the S-SRQ in Spanish was like the original scale, with some exceptions. The scale has potential to be implemented in our context, both at a practical and scientific level.
Downloads
References
Asociación Argentina de Estudio e Investigación en Psicodiagnóstico -ADEIP-. (2000). Pautas Internacionales para el Uso de los Tests. Versión Argentina. Argentina: ADEIP. http://www.adeip.org.ar/pautas_min_test.htm
Barnett, J. E., Erickson Cornish, J. A., Goodyear, R. K., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (2007). Commentaries on the ethical and effective practice of clinical supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/07357028.38.3.268
Beinart, H. (2012). Models of supervision and the supervisory relationship. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice, and perspectives (pp. 47–62). Hove, UK: Routledge. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-03314-000
Beinart, H., & Clohessy, S. (2017). Effective Supervisory Relationships: Best Evidence and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Nueva York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Cliffe, T., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2016). Development and validation of a short version of the supervisory relationship questionnaire. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 23(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1935
Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International journal of public health, 58(4), 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
Ellis, M. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325221003741910
Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Hanus, A. E., Ayala, E. E., Swords, B. A., & Siembor, M. (2013). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
Enander, J., Andersson, E., Kaldo, V., Lindefors, N., Andersson, G., & Rück, C. (2012). Internet administration of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale: a psychometric evaluation. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(4), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.07.008
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
Falender, C.A., Cornish, J.A.E., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N.J., Leventhal, G., … Grus, C. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20013
Falender, C.A., & Shafranske, E.P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological methods, 9(4), 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
Freitas, G. J. (2002). The impact of psychotherapy supervision on client outcome: A critical examination of 2 decades of research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.4.354
Garrido, C. I. T. (2018). Comparación entre la aplicación en formato papel y en formato online de dos instrumentos de evaluación: Cuestionario de la Forma Corporal y Cuestionario de los Tres Factores versión revisada 18. In Intervención en contextos clínicos y de la salud: Volumen II (pp. 271-278). Asociación Universitaria de Educación y Psicología -ASUNIVEP-. https://formacionasunivep.com/Vcice/files/libro%20intervencion%20en%20contextos%20clinicos.pdf#page=271
Gibson, A. S., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (2019). Toward a nuanced understanding of nondisclosure in psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000295
Gibson, J. A., Grey, I. M., & Hastings, R. P. (2009). Supervisor support as a predictor of burnout and therapeutic self-efficacy in therapists working in ABA schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0709-4
Goodyear, R. K., & Guzzardo, C. R. (2000). Psychotherapy supervision and training. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 83–108). New York, NY: Wiley.
Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Ancis, J. R. (2001). Psychotherapy trainees’ experience of counterproductive events in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 371–383– 383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.371
Hill, C., & Knox, S. Training and supervisión in psychotherapy, in Lambert, M. J. (2013). Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. John Wiley & Sons.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holloway, E. L. (2012). Professional competence in supervision. In J. N. Fuertes, A. Spokane, & E. L. Holloway (Eds.), The professional competencies in counseling psychology (pp. 165–181). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Inman, A.G., Hutman, H., Pendse, A., Devdas, L., Luu, L., & Ellis, M.V. (2014). Current trends concerning supervisors, supervisees, and clients in clinical supervision. In C. E. Watkins, Jr., & D. Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 61–102). Oxford, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846360.ch4
Inman, A.G., & Ladany, N. (2008). Research: The state of the field. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 500–517). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Kennedy, E. K., Keaney, C., Shaldon, C., & Canagaratnam, M. (2018). A relational model of supervision for applied psychology practice: professional growth through relating and reflecting. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(3), 282-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1456407
Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
Mehr, K. E., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you? Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733141003712301
Milne, D. L. (2017). Evidence-based CBT supervision: Principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Milne, D. L., Reiser, R. P., Cliffe, T., & Raine, R. (2011). SAGE: Preliminary evaluation of an instrument for observing competence in CBT supervision. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 4, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X11000079
Milne, D., Sheikh, A., Pattison, S., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Evidence-based training for clinical supervisors: A systematic review of 11 controlled studies. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.564955
Olk, M., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1037//00220167.39.3.389
Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 9(11), 8. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1144&context=pare
Palomo, M., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2010). Development and validation of the supervisory relationship questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466509X441033
Reiser, R.P., & Watkins, C.E. (2014). The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision. D. Milne (Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Revelle, W. (2014). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston. R package version, 1(1). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of statistical software, 48(2), 1-36. http://users.ugent.be/~yrosseel/lavaan/lavaanIntroduction.pdf
Scaturo, D.J., & Watkins, C.E. (2014). Supervising integrative and eclectic psychotherapies. In C. E. Watkins, & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 552–575). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Simon, D., Cruise, T., Huber, B., Swerdlik, M., & Newman, D. (2014). Supervision in school psychology: The developmental/ecological/problem-solving model. Psychology in the Schools, 51(6), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21772
Stoltenberg, C.D. (2005). Enhancing professional competence through developmental approaches to supervision. American Psychologist, 60(8), 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.8.85
Tangen, J.L., & Borders, L. D. (2016). The supervisory relationship: A conceptual and psychometric review of measures. Counselor Education & Supervision, 55(3), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12043
Watkins, C.E. (2011). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011. 619417
Watkins, C.E. (2012). Psychotherapy supervision in the new millennium: Competency-based, evidence-based, particularized, and energized. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-011-9202-4
Watkins, C.E., Jr. (2018, May 24). The Generic Model of Psychotherapy Supervision: An Analogized Research-Informing Meta-Theory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000114
Watkins, C.E. (2014). The supervisory alliance: A half century of theory, practice and research in critical perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 68, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.1.19
Wheeler, S., & Richards, K. (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counselors and therapists, their practice and their clients: A systematic review of the literature. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 7, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140601185274
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 CES Psicología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each manuscript is accompanied by a statement specifyingThat the materials are unpublished, that have not been previously published in printed formatElectronic and that they will not be presented to any other means before knowing the decision of the magazine. ThroughoutIn case, any previous publication, sea in printed or electronic form, must be made known to the editorial staffWriting The authors attach a signed statement stating that, and the manuscript is acceptedFor publication, the rights of reproduction are the exclusive property of the Journal CES Psychology.Article metrics | |
---|---|
Abstract views | |
Galley vies | |
PDF Views | |
HTML views | |
Other views |