Ideological Influences on Intergroup Attitudes in the Context of The Hague Court Boundary Dispute between Peru and Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.5745Keywords:
political ideology, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), Social Dominance Orientation (SDO), intergroup relationsAbstract
In the context of the border dispute presented by Peru against Chile in the The Hague Court, this study analyzes the influences of two ideological motivational dimensions: Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) on a set of intergroup attitudes that involve both nations. To this end, a survey study of 196 Chileans and 223 Peruvians participants was conducted. The instruments used to measure ideology and political attitudes are the following ones: RWA Scale; SDO Scale; Scale of Intergroup attitudes between Chile-Peru and specific questions on interest in the Hague litigation and willingness to fight for one's country. The results show that in the Peruvian case attitudes of belligerence and alert and a greater willingness to fight for the country are better explained by the RWA, while in the Chilean case these same attitudes are explained both by the RWA as well as the SDO. On the other hand, pacificist attitudes are explained inversely by SDO in both countries. These findings support the hypothesis that intergroup dynamics between both countries have been marked by expressed actions of a Chilean expansionism versus a Peruvian vengefulness and suggest that equalitarianism will promote attitudes toward respect and cooperation between both groups, changing the frames of expansionism and vengefulness for one of a culture of peace.
Downloads
References
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2
Aspelund, A., Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2013). Political Conservatism and Left–Right Orientation in 28 Eastern and Western European Countries. Political Psychology, 34(3), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12000
Barros Arana, D. (1879-1881/1979). Historia de la Guerra del Pacífico. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andrés Bello.
Bobowik, M., Páez, D., Liu, J.H., Espinosa, A., Techio, E., Zubieta, E., & Cabecinhas, R. (2010). Beliefs about history, the meaning of historical events and culture of war. Revista de Psicología, PUCP, 28(1), 111-146.
Cancino, H. (2006). La dominación oligárquica en Chile en la interpretación de Julio César Jobet. Sociedad y Discurso, AAU, 10, 57-78.
Cárdenas, M., Meza, P., Lagues, K., & Yañez, S. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social (SDO) en una muestra chilena. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 161-68.
Cárdenas, M., & Parra, L. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Versión Abreviada de la Escala de Autoritarismos de Derechas (RWA) en una muestra chilena. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17098
Cichocka, A., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in capitalist and post‐Communist societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12011
Cid, G. (2012). La nación bajo examen. La historiografía sobre el nacionalismo y la identidad nacional en el siglo XIX chileno. Polis, Revista de la Universidad Bolivariana, 11(32), 329-350.
Cohrs, J. C., & Ibler, S. (2009). Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 81–94.
Corte Internacional de Justicia. (2015). Informe de la Corte Internacional de Justicia (Asamblea General, Documentos Oficiales, Sexagésimo noveno período de sesiones, Suplemento núm. 4). https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/annual-reports/2013-2014-es.pdf
Díaz, E. J. U. (2014). La Guerra del Pacífico como referente nacional y punto condicionante de las relaciones chileno-peruanas. Si Somos Americanos, Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, 14(2), 159-185.
Dru, V. (2007). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: Effects of various self-categorization conditions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 877-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.008
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Mark P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, (pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
Duckitt, J. (2003). Prejudice and intergroup hostility. In D. Sears, L. Huddy, R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 559-600). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24(1), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00322
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(7), 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1
Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2005). Authoritarianism and Social Dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The Importance of the Sociopolitical Context and of Political Interest and Involvement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x
Espinosa, A. (2011). Estudios sobre Identidad Nacional en el Perú y sus correlatos psicológicos, sociales y culturales. Doctoral Dissertation. Departamento de Psicología Social y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Universidad del País Vasco, San Sebastián.
Espinosa, A., János, E., Páez, D., & Lewis, H.M. (2021). The relationship between political ideology and national identity in Latin America: a Meta-Analytical synthesis. In C. Zúñiga, & W. López-López (Eds). Political Psychology in Latin America (pp. 151-174). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Espinosa, A., Soares da Silva, A., Contreras, C., Cueto, R.M., García, A., Ortolano, F., Valencia, J. D., & Vera, A. (2017). Identidad Nacional y sus relaciones con la ideología y el bienestar en cinco países de América Latina. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana. 35(2), 351-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.3765
Genna, K., Espinosa, A., & Páez, D. (2010). Cómo los vemos, Cómo nos vemos. Influencia de la comparación social entre Perú y Chile en la identidad nacional peruana. Psicología Política, 41, 81-108.
GFK-ADIMARK. (2014). Encuesta Final Evaluación Gestión del Gobierno del Presidente Piñera. Informe Mensual Febrero. Retrieved from: https://docplayer.es/77294947-Encuesta-final-evaluacion-gestion-del-gobierno-del-pdte-pinera-informe-mensual-febrero-2014.html
González, A. (2014). Perú-Chile: Imágenes mutuas. Liberabit, 20(1), 13-28.
González, A. (2019). Estrategia psicosocial para la integración fronteriza Perú-Chile y Bolivia. In M. L. Maric (Editor). Factores Psicosociales para construir Cultura de Paz en la Región (pp. 137-186). La Paz: Instituto de Estudios Bolivianos.
González Prada, M. (1976). Pájinas Libres y Horas de Lucha. Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.
Hosiasson, L. (2011). Nação e Imaginação na Guerra do Pacifico. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade São Paulo.
Ibáñez, C. (2013). Percepción de la relación Chile-Perú y su influencia en la identidad nacional, las representaciones estereotípicas y los prejuicios hacia el exogrupo nacional. Unpublished License Dissertation. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. The Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule--Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383
Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (2009). Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social Dominance and Social Identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup Favoritism or Outgroup Derogation? Political Psychology, 20, 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00138
Liu, J. H., Huang, L. L., & McFedries, C. (2008). Cross‐sectional and longitudinal differences in social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism as a function of political power and societal change. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(2), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00249.x
Livi, S., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Epistemic motivation and perpetuation of group culture: Effects of need for cognitive closure on trans-generational norm transmission. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.010
López, S. (2014). Disputa Marítima entre Perú y Chile: Comentario de la sentencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia, de fecha 27 de enero de 2014. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 41(3), 1133 – 1153.
Lyons, A. C., Cude, B., Lawrence, F. C., & Gutter, M. (2005). Conducting research online: Challenges facing researchers in family and consumer sciences. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33, 341-356.
McEvoy, C. (2012). Civilización, Masculinidad y Superioridad Racial: Una aproximación al discurso republicano chileno durante la Guerra del Pacífico (1879-1884). Revista de Sociología Política, 20(42), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782012000200007
Monsegur, S., Espinosa, A., & Beramendi, M. (2014). Identidad Nacional y su relación con la Dominancia Social y la Tolerancia a la Transgresión en residentes de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Interdisciplinaria, 31, 5-21.
Montero, M. (1992). Atracción y repulsión: Identidad nacional en hijos de inmigrantes. Boletín de Psicología, 37, 21-42.
Montero, M. (1996). Identidad Social Negativa y Crisis Socioeconómica: Un Estudio Psicosocial. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 33, 43-58.
Moya, M. & Morales-Marente, E. (2005). Reacciones psico-políticas ante los ataques terroristas del 11 de marzo de 2004. Revista de Psicología Social, 20(3), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347405774277749
Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). The “Antidemocratic Personality” Revisited: A Cross‐National Investigation of Working‐Class Authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 595-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x
Oesterreich, D. (2005). Flight into Security: A new Approach and Measure of the Authoritarian Personality. Political Psychology, 26(2), 275-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00418.x
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: Advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 288-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1379265
Páez, D., Marques, J., Valencia, J., & Vincze, O. (2006). Dealing with collective shame and guilt. Psicología Política, 32, 59-78.
Robles, R., & Espinosa, A. (2020). Memoria de eventos y personajes históricos y su relación con la identidad nacional en jóvenes universitarios y cadetes de formación castrense en el Perú. Revista de Psicología, 16(32), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.46553/RPSI.16.32.2020.p46-67.
Rodríguez-Elizondo, J. (2004). Chile-Perú: El siglo que vivimos en peligro. Santiago de Chile: Mondadori.
Rottenbacher, J. M., Espinosa, A., & Magallanes, J. M. (2011). Analizando el Prejuicio: Bases ideológicas del Racismo, el Sexismo y la Homofobia en una muestra de habitantes de la ciudad de Lima–Perú. Revista Psicologia Política, 11(22), 225-246.
Salazar, G. (2005). Construcción de Estado en Chile (1800-1837). Democracia de los “pueblos”, militarismo ciudadano. Golpismo oligárquico. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Sudamericana.
Sansoni, I. M. (2012). La Guerra del Pacífico en la Historiografía Latinoamericana del Siglo XIX y principios del Siglo XX. Revista de la Red Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea-Segunda Época, 1(1). Retrieved from: http://www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/viewFile/8322/9193.
Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Mark Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1-65). San Diego: Academic Press.
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(5), 540-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365364
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, Conservatism, Affirmative Action, and Intellectual Sophistication: A Matter of Principled Conservatism or Group Dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 476-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25(6), 845-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
Smith, P. & Schwartz, S. (1996). Values. In J. Berry, M. Segal & C. Kagitçibasi (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (vol. 3, pp. 77-118.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Stone, W. (2001). Manipulación del Terror y Autoritarismo. Psicología Política, 23, 7-17.
Valencia-Moya, J. (2018). Orientación a la Dominancia Social de las élites en Chile. Interciencia, 43(5), 372-378.
Valencia-Moya, J., Espinosa, A., Jiménez-Benítez, V., & Romero, J.C. (2018). Ideología, identidad nacional, representaciones estereotípicas y valoración exogrupal: un estudio sobre las relaciones entre Perú y Chile. Interciencia, 43(5), 304-312.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 965-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00250.x.
Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects on Political Conservatism. Political Psychology, 34(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00929.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 CES Psicología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Each manuscript is accompanied by a statement specifyingThat the materials are unpublished, that have not been previously published in printed formatElectronic and that they will not be presented to any other means before knowing the decision of the magazine. ThroughoutIn case, any previous publication, sea in printed or electronic form, must be made known to the editorial staffWriting The authors attach a signed statement stating that, and the manuscript is acceptedFor publication, the rights of reproduction are the exclusive property of the Journal CES Psychology.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
