Aplicación e integración de principios y usos del comercio internacional de sistemas reglamentarios

Autores/as

  • Dimitris Liakopoulos Tufts University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21615/cesder.11.1.3

Palabras clave:

CISG, art. 7 CISG, modelos de codificación, estado de derecho, UE, derecho privado internacional, derecho económico internacional, codifiicación, derecho blando, derecho duro

Resumen

El presente trabajo se concentra en los pensamientos y perspectivas de los modelos de codificación de leyes no escritas no escritas en el sistema de comercio internacional, siguiendo un análisis especialmente comparativo y crítico con los sistemas de leyes duras y la integración regulatoria en el derecho económico privado, europeo e internacional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias bibliográficas

Aksal, Y. (2011). Implementing international economic law. Through dispute settlement. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston, pp. 158ss.

Andrews, N. (2013). “Civil procedure”, in Burrows, A. (ed.), English private law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013, chapter 22.

Ballestros, M.H. (2014). “The regime of party autonomy in the Brussels I Recast: The solutions adopted for agreements on jurisdiction”. Journal of Private International Law. 10, pp. 292ss.

Beaumont, P. Danov, M. Trimmings, K. (2017). Cross border litigation in Europe, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2017.

Bergè, J.S. Francq, S. Gardens Santiago, M. (2015). Boundaries of European private international law, ed. Bruylant, Bruxelles.

Berger, K.P. (2001). The practice of transnational law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.

Bergsten, E.E. Kröll, S. (2011). International arbitration and international commercial law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.

Boele-Woelki, K. Einhorn, T. Girsberger, D. Symeonides, S. (eds.), (2010). Convergance and divergance in private international law: Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr, Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp. 564ss.

Bonell, M.J. (2006). The Unidroit principles in practice. International case law and bibliography on the Unidroit principles of international commercial contracts, Kluwer, Irvington, New York.

Boyle, A.E. (1999). “Some reflections on the relationship of treaties and soft law”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 48, pp. 530ss.

Brand, R.A. Fish, T. (2008). “An American perspective on the New Japanese Act on General Rules for Application of Laws”. Japanese Yearbook of International Law. pp. 302ss.

Calvo Caravaca, A.L. Carrascosa Gonzàlez, J. (2017). Litigaciòn internacional en la Uniòn Europea II, ed. Comares, Granada, pp. 106ss.

Carruthers, J. (2012). “Party autonomy in the legal regulation of adult relationships: what place for party choice in private international law?”. The International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 61 (4), pp. 881ss.

D’Avout, L. (2010). “Droits fondamentaux et coordination des ordres juridiques en droit privé”, in E. Dubout, S. Touzè (a cura di), Les droits fondamentaux: charnières entre ordres juridiques et systèmes juridiques, ed. Pedone, Paris, pp. 184ss.

Dalhuisen, J.H. (2016). Dalhuisen on transnational comparative commercial financial and trade law, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland.

Dannemann, G. Vogenauer, S. (2013). The common european sales law in context. Interactions with english and german law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 16ss.

Delebecque, P. (2016). L’enteprise et la vente internationale de machandises, Larcier, Bruxelles.

Dewez, J. et al., (2011). “The duty to renegotiate an international sales contract under CISG in case of hardship and the use of the Unidroit principles”. European Review of Private Law. 19, pp. 102ss.

Di Mateo, L.A. (2014). International sales law: A global challenge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Felemegas, J. (2007). An international approach to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the international sale of goods (1980) as uniform sales law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Ferrari, F. (2011). Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: Applicability and application of the 1980 United Nations Convention, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.

Fletcher, I. Mistelis, L, Cremona M. (eds.), (2001). Foundations and perspectives of international trade law, Sweet & Maxwell, London.

Garro, A.M. (1994-1995). “The gap-filling role of the Unidroit principles in international sales law: Some comments on the interplay between the principles an CISG”. Tulane Law Review. 69, pp. 1150ss.

Gèlinas, F. (2016). Trade usages and implied terms in the age of arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Gillette, C.P. (2016). Advanced introduction to international sales law, Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham.

Honnold, J.P. Flechtner, H.M. (1999). Uniform law for international sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.

Horn, N. Schmitthoff C. (eds.), (1982). The transnational law of international commercial transactions, ed. Kluwer, Deventer.

Horn, N. Schmitthoff, C. Barrigan J. (eds.), (1982). The transnational law of international commercial transactions, Kluwer Law International, Boston.

Jansen, N. Zimermann, R. (2018). Commentaries on European contracts laws, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Janssen, A. Meyer, O. (2009). CISG methodology, ed. European Law Publishers, Münich, pp. 145ss.

Kjos, J.E. (2013). Applicable law in investor-State arbitration. The interplacy between national and international law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 123ss.

Komarorv, A.S. (2005-2006). “Internationality, uniformity and observance of good faith as criteria in interpretation of CISG: Some remarks on article 7 (1)”. Journal of law and Commerce. 25, pp. 76ss.

Kramer, X.E. (2015). “The interaction between Rome I and mandatory European Union private rules-EPIL and EPL: Communicating vessels?”, in Stone, P. Farah, Y. Research Handbook on European Union private international law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 250ss.

Kroenke, H. (2000). “International uniform commercial law conventions: Advantages, disadvantages, criteria for choice”. Uniform Law Review. 13, pp. 14ss.

Kroll-Ludwigs, K. (2013). Die Rolle der Parteiautonomie in europäischen Kollisionsrecht, ed. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 573ss.

Laird, I.A. Sabqhi, B. Sourgens, F.G. Weiler, T.J. (2015) Investment treaty arbitration and international law, Juris Publishing, New York.

Liakopoulos, D. (2018). “Interactions between European Court of Human Rights and private international law of European Union”. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional. 10 (1).

Luttrell, S. (2009). Bias challenges in international commercial arbitration. The need for a “real danger” test, Kluwer Law, The Hague, pp. 64ss.

Mcparland, M. (2015). The Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Okoli, C.S.A. Arishe, H.O. (2012). “The operation of the escape clauses in the Rome Convention, Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation”. Journal of Private International Law. 14 (4), pp. 516ss.

Saumier, G. (2014). “The Hague Principles and the choice of non-State “rules of law” to govern an international commercial contract”. Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 40, (1).

Schlechtriem, P. Schwenzer, I. (eds.), (2010). Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Schlechtriem, P. Witz, C. (2008). Convention de Vienne sur les Contrats de Vente Internationale de Marchandises, ed. LGDJ, Paris.

Schulze, R. (2009). Common frame of reference and existing EC contract law, ed. De Gruyter, Berlin.

Schwenzer, I. (2009). “Force majeure and hardship in international sales contracts”. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. 39 (4), pp. 714ss.

Schwenzer, I. Hachem, P. Kee, C. (2012). Global sales and contract law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 838ss.

Slater, S.D. (1998). “Overcome by hardship: the inapplicability of the Unidroit principles hardship provisions to CISG”. Florida Journal of International Law. 12, pp. 232ss.

Smith, Q. (2011). “Reviewing the history and application of article 7 of the Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG)”. Transnational Dispute Management, 8, pp. 2ss.

Symeonides, S. (2006). “Contracts subject to non-State norms”. American Journal of Comparative Law. pp. 210ss.

Teubner G. (ed.), (1997). Global law without a State, Darthmouth Publishing, Dartmouth.

Van Houtte, V. (2002). The law of international trade, Sweet & Maxwell, London.

Waincymer, J. (2012). Procedure and evidence in international arbitration, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp. 5ss.

Wais, H. (2017). “Einseitige Gerichtsstandverinbarungen und die Schranken der Parteiautonomie”. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht. 81.

Wautelet, P. Kruger, T. Coppens, G. (2012). The protection of arbitration. Essays in honour of Hans Van Houtte, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-05-12

Cómo citar

Liakopoulos, D. (2020). Aplicación e integración de principios y usos del comercio internacional de sistemas reglamentarios. CES Derecho, 11(1), 55–88. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesder.11.1.3

Número

Sección

Artículos de reflexión
QR Code
Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.