Relationship between objective and subjective indicators of social class from a psychological perspective

Authors

  • Pablo Correa Instituto de investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7597-7180
  • Silvina Brussino Instituto de investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-644X
  • Cecilia Reyna Instituto de investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.7164

Keywords:

social class, socioeconomic status, subjective social status, educational level, income level

Abstract

In recent decades, the interest from Social Psychology in the objective and subjective aspects of social class and its association with other psycho-sociological variables has grown. Thus, in this work we set out to analyze the relationship between the socioeconomic status (SES), singular indicators of the SES (educational level and occupation), the level of family income and the subjective social status (SSS), and also to investigate the differences in the SSS according to gender, in a sample of 442 citizens from Greater Córdoba, Argentina from 18 to 64 years old (M = 38.61, DE = 14.23). The study design was cross-sectional, ex post facto retrospective. Descriptive, correlation and group comparison analysis were conducted. The results showed that, regardless of their SES, people perceived to have a medium SSS (79%). In addition, we find that the relationship between SES, family income level, educational level, occupation and SSS was statistically significant. According to the regression model, the level of family income was the only indicator related to SSS. Also, we found that women with a low SES (Mdn = 5.00, R = 6.00) perceived to have a higher SSS than men with a low SES (Mdn = 4.00, R = 6.00). In conclusion, people tend to position themselves in the middle levels of the MacArthur scale even when their objective socioeconomic status does not reflect that position. In addition, women with a low SES tend to position themselves at higher levels on the MacArthur scale than men with a low SES.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pablo Correa, Instituto de investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina

PhD. in Psychology. Professor and researcher Psychological Research Institute (IIPSI) - National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) - National University of Córdoba (UNC).

Silvina Brussino, Instituto de investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina.

PhD. in Psychology. Professor and researcher Institute of Psychological Investigations (IIPSI) - National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) - National University of Córdoba (UNC).

Cecilia Reyna, Instituto de investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina.

PhD. in Psychology. Professor and researcher Institute of Psychological Investigations (IIPSI) - National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) - National University of Córdoba (UNC).

References

Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586

Adler, N., Singh-Manoux, A., Schwartz, J., Stewart, J., Matthews, K., & Marmot, M. G. (2008). Social status and health: A comparison of British civil servants in Whitehall-II with European- and African-Americans in CARDIA. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1034-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.031

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologist and code of conduct. APA: Washington, DC.

American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. APA: Washington, DC.

Barreiro, A., & Ungaretti, J. (2020). Representaciones y juicios sobre la justicia social en la Argentina durante la pandemia COVID-19. Observatorio de Psicología Social Aplicada, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires. https://www.psi.uba.ar/opsa/informes/Informe%20Justicia%20Social%202.pdf

Baker, E. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. En W. C. Cockerham, R. Dingwall, and S. R. Quah (Eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior and Society (pp. 2210–2214). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs395

Benza, G., Iuliano, R., Álvarez Leguizamón, S., & Pinedo, J. (2016). Las clases sociales en la investigación social de la Argentina (2003-2014). En S. Álvarez Leguizamón, A. J. Arias, & Muníz Terra, L. (Coords.) Estudios sobre la estructura social en la Argentina contemporánea (pp. 143-214). CLACSO.

Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., & Madero Cabib, I. (2013). Todos somos de clase media: Sobre el estatus social subjetivo en Chile. Latin American Research Review, 48(1), 155–173. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41811592

Código de Ética de la Federación de Psicólogos de la República Argentina. (2013). Aprobado en 1999 y modificado el 30 de noviembre de 2013.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Comisión de Enlace Institucional, AAM-SAIMO-CEIM. (2015). El nivel socioeconómico en la argentina, 2015. Estratificación y variables. SAIMO Observatorio Social. https://www.saimo.org.ar/archivos/observatorio-social/El-NSE-en-la-Argentina-2015-Estratificacion-y-Variables.pdf

Consejo Nacional de Coordinación de Políticas Sociales. (2021). Pobreza multidimensional. Desde un enfoque de derechos. Primer semestre de 2021. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/informes-de-la-situacion-social/pobreza-multidimensional

Corporación Latinobarómetro. (2021). Informe 2021. https://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp

Corporación Latinobarómetro. (2020). Documento de Resultados - Argentina. https://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp

Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009

D’Amico, V. (2013). La desigualdad como definición de la cuestión social en las agendas trasnacionales sobre políticas sociales para América Latina. Una lectura desde las ciencias sociales. Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America. Working Paper No. 49.

Demakakos, P., Nazroo, J., Breeze, E., & Marmot, M. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status. Social Science & Medicine, 67(2), 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.038

Díaz-Sánchez, K. E., & Bruno, J. M. (2022). Millennials y el turismo religioso. Posicionamientos y segmentos. Marketing de Servicios: Su Esencia, 1(1), 1–11.

Dhurandhar, E. J., Pavela, G., Kaiser, K. A., Dutton, G. R., Fontaine, K. R., Kim, D., Shikany, J.M., Allison, D.B., & Lewis, C. E. (2018). Body mass index and subjective social status: The coronary artery risk development in young adults study. Obesity, 26(2), 426-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22047

Diemer, M. A., Mistry, R. S., Wadsworth, M. E., López, I., & Reimers, F. (2013). Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 77-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12001

Echavarría, C., & Bard Wigdor, G. (2013). Frente a la crisis neoliberal, las mujeres se organizan: la experiencia de participación comunitaria de las mujeres de sectores populares en la Argentina. Nomadias, 17, 89-107. https://nomadias.uchile.cl/index.php/NO/article/view/29940

Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2004). Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/16.1.3

Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Kolosi, T. (1992). Images of class: Public perceptions in Hungary and Australia. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 461-482.

Gatica, L., Martini, J. P., Dreizik, M., & Imhoff, D. (2017). Predictores psicosociales y psicopolíticos de la justificación de la desigualdad social. Revista de Psicología, 35(1), 279-310. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201701.010

Giatti, L., do Valle Camelo, L., Fernandes de Castro Rodrigues, J., & Barreto, S. M. (2012). Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status - Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health, 12, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1096

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censo [INDEC]. (2019). Evolución de la distribución del ingreso (EPH). https://www.indec.gob.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/ingresos_2trim19714C91B81A.pdf

Iturra Sanhueza, J. C., & Mellado Riffo, D. (2018). Estatus social subjetivo en tres países de América Latina: El caso de Argentina, Chile y Venezuela. Contenido Cultura y Ciencias Sociales, 8, 3-20.

Jorrat, J. R. (2012). Clase, identidad de clase y percepción de las sociedades desde elitistas hasta igualitarias: Argentina en un contexto comparativo internacional. Desarrollo Económico, 52(205), 63-93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23612373

Jorrat, J. R. (2008, del 10 al 12 de diciembre). Percepciones populares de clase [Presentación]. I Encuentro Latinoamericano de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales. La Plata, Argentina. https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.9515/ev.9515.pdf

Kessler, G. (2019). Entre la situación y la percepción: Pobreza subjetiva y movilidad social en América Latina. Integración & Comercio, 45, 256-267. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/152516

Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2013). Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032895

Kraus, M. W., & Stephens, N. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x

Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357

Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756

Kraus, M. W., Tan, J. J. X., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2013). The social-ladder: A rank-based perspective on social class. Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.778803

Manstead, A. S. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251

Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33770318.pdf

Navarro-Carrillo, G., Alonso-Ferres, M., Moya, M., & Valor-Segura, I. (2020). Socioeconomic status and psychological well-being: Revisiting the role of subjective socioeconomic status. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303

Observatorio de Psicología Social Aplicada. (2021a). Escenario políticos y electorales CABA. https://www.psi.uba.ar/opsa/informes/CABA%20AGOSTO%202021_FINAL.pdf

Observatorio de Psicología Social Aplicada. (2021b). Percepción de la situación del país y escenarios políticos. https://www.psi.uba.ar/opsa/informes/Escenarios_Politicos_FINAL.pdf

Observatorio de Psicología Social Aplicada. (2020). Encuesta sobre felicidad, creencias, fantasías e imaginarios existenciales y personales. https://www.psi.uba.ar/opsa/informes/OPSA%20UBA%20-%20Encuesta%20Felicidad%20creencias%20fantasias%20e%20imaginarios%20(Diciembre).pdf

Operario, D., Adler, N. E., & Williams, D. R. (2004). Subjective social status: Reliability and predictive utility for global health. Psychology and Health, 19(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440310001638098

Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. (2021). Índice de pobreza multidimensional global 2021. https://hdr.undp.org/en/2021-MPI

Quiroga-Garza, A., García-Sánchez, E., Treviño, F. A., & Willis, G. B. (2018). Relación entre clase social subjetiva y autoeficacia: efecto de la comparación social. Anales de Psicología, 34(2), 314-323. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.2.266611

Romero, W., & Bologna, E. (2013). Técnicas de muestreo. En Eduardo Bologna (Ed.), Estadística para psicología y educación (pp. 251-276). Brujas.

Romero-Vidal, X. (2021). Measuring objective and subjective class: the effects of survey questionnaires on the study of class voting. Political Research Exchange, 3(1), 1978820. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2021.1978820

Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(6), 855-861. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0

Shaked, D., Williams, M., Evans, M. K., & Zonderman, A. B. (2016). Indicators of subjective social status: Differential associations across race and sex. SSM - Population Health, 2, 700-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.009

Smith, L. (2010). Psychology, poverty, and the end of social exclusion: Putting our practice to work. Teachers College Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Yu, S., & Blader, S. L. (2019). Why does social class affect subjective well-being? The role of status and power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219853841

Published

2024-05-29

How to Cite

Correa, P., Brussino, S., & Reyna, C. (2024). Relationship between objective and subjective indicators of social class from a psychological perspective. CES Psicología, 17(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.7164

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales
QR Code
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo