EL DEBATE AXIOLÓGICO COMO PROPUESTA DE INTERVENCIÓN TERAPÉUTICA COMPLEMENTARIA A LOS DEBATES CLÁSICOS DE LA REBT EN LA DEPRESIÓN (The axiological argument as a complementary therapeutic proposal to the classic REBT arguments in depression)
Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer el efecto diferencial favorable en la reducción de los síntomas depresivos, del debate axiológico administrado adicional y conjuntamente con los debates, lógico, empírico y pragmático de la REBT, a un grupo experimental de 20 pacientes adultos masculinos con depresión, versus otro equivalente de control en el cual se administraron solo los segundos. Con cada grupo se realizaron 15 sesiones, a cargo de dos terapeutas expertos utilizando las estrategias de debate. Los resultados Chi- cuadrado confirman los efectos de mejoría en los participantes del grupo experimental reportados en la escala de Beck con un valor X2=6,97534, superior al X2= 3,551 esperado con p≤0.001 y gl=32. Se concluye que el debate axiológico promueve operaciones evaluativo-emocionales adicionales como la jerarquización, la revaloración, la comparación y la renormatización de principios y valores bajo una perspectiva posibilística, probabilística, relativista, diversa y optativa que flexibiliza la filosofía del paciente disminuyendo su sintomatología depresiva.
Palabras claves:Depresión, Creencias Irracionales, Axiología, Terapia Racional-emotiva; REBT: Debates.
Abstract
This study was aimed to establish a differential effect that facilitates reduction of depressive symptoms of the axiological argument administrated in conjunction with the logical, empirical and pragmatic of the REBT, to an experimental group of 20 masculine adult patients, depressed diagnosed, versus another equivalent group of control in which only seconds were administrated. 15 sessions were conducted by two therapists, and strategies of argument were used. The improvement effects in the experimental participants are confirmed by the chi-square results and they are reported on the Beck scale with a value of X2=6,97534, higher than the expected with X2= 3,551with p≤0.001 and fg=32. It is concluded, the axiological argument promotes additional evaluative-emotional operations such as ranking, reassessment, comparison, and reformulation of principles and values from a possibilistic, probabilistic, relativistic, and elective view that makes flexible the patient's philosophy and decreases their depressive symptoms.
Keywords: Depression, irrational Beliefs, Axiology, Rational Emotive Behavior Teraphy; REBT; Arguments.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Each manuscript is accompanied by a statement specifyingThat the materials are unpublished, that have not been previously published in printed formatElectronic and that they will not be presented to any other means before knowing the decision of the magazine. ThroughoutIn case, any previous publication, sea in printed or electronic form, must be made known to the editorial staffWriting The authors attach a signed statement stating that, and the manuscript is acceptedFor publication, the rights of reproduction are the exclusive property of the Journal CES Psychology.Article metrics | |
---|---|
Abstract views | |
Galley vies | |
PDF Views | |
HTML views | |
Other views |