Relación de supervisión: adaptación del S-SRQ en psicoterapeutas argentinos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.13.3.5Palabras clave:
Relación de Supervisión, Evaluación de Supervisión, Psicoterapia, Adaptación, Supervisión Clínica, Psicología clínica, Supervisión en Psicología, Supervisión en Psicoterapia, Investigación en PsicoterapiaResumen
Introducción: En los últimos años se ha reconocido la importancia de evaluar la supervisión clínica y su rol en el proceso psicoterapéutico. No obstante, son escasos los instrumentos que cumplen con este propósito, particularmente en Latinoamérica. En este estudio, se buscó adaptar al castellano la versión breve del Cuestionario de relación de supervisión (S-SRQ, por sus siglas en inglés de: Short Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire), compuesto de tres dimensiones: base segura, educación reflexiva y estructura; y aportar evidencias sobre su desempeño psicométrico. Método: El S-SRQ fue traducido y retraducido a su idioma original. Posteriormente, fue administrado a 374 psicoterapeutas argentinos (muestra no probabilística). Se realizaron análisis de consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach), dimensionales (análisis paralelo y factorial confirmatorio), y a nivel del ítem (coeficientes estandarizados y correlación ítem-escala). Resultados: Los coeficientes de consistencia interna fueron adecuados para la escala total y, en general, para cada dimensión. Los análisis dimensionales se ajustaron a un modelo de tres dimensiones, base segura, educación reflexiva y estructura. El desempeño de los ítems fue bueno con relación a la escala total y cada dimensión. Discusión: El desempeño psicométrico del S-SRQ en castellano fue similar al de la escala original, con algunas diferencias. La escala presenta potencial para ser aplicada en el contexto argentino, tanto en el ámbito científico como en la práctica.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
Asociación Argentina de Estudio e Investigación en Psicodiagnóstico -ADEIP-. (2000). Pautas Internacionales para el Uso de los Tests. Versión Argentina. Argentina: ADEIP. http://www.adeip.org.ar/pautas_min_test.htm
Barnett, J. E., Erickson Cornish, J. A., Goodyear, R. K., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (2007). Commentaries on the ethical and effective practice of clinical supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/07357028.38.3.268
Beinart, H. (2012). Models of supervision and the supervisory relationship. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice, and perspectives (pp. 47–62). Hove, UK: Routledge. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-03314-000
Beinart, H., & Clohessy, S. (2017). Effective Supervisory Relationships: Best Evidence and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Nueva York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Cliffe, T., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2016). Development and validation of a short version of the supervisory relationship questionnaire. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 23(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1935
Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International journal of public health, 58(4), 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
Ellis, M. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325221003741910
Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Hanus, A. E., Ayala, E. E., Swords, B. A., & Siembor, M. (2013). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
Enander, J., Andersson, E., Kaldo, V., Lindefors, N., Andersson, G., & Rück, C. (2012). Internet administration of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale: a psychometric evaluation. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(4), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.07.008
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
Falender, C.A., Cornish, J.A.E., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N.J., Leventhal, G., … Grus, C. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20013
Falender, C.A., & Shafranske, E.P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological methods, 9(4), 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
Freitas, G. J. (2002). The impact of psychotherapy supervision on client outcome: A critical examination of 2 decades of research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.4.354
Garrido, C. I. T. (2018). Comparación entre la aplicación en formato papel y en formato online de dos instrumentos de evaluación: Cuestionario de la Forma Corporal y Cuestionario de los Tres Factores versión revisada 18. In Intervención en contextos clínicos y de la salud: Volumen II (pp. 271-278). Asociación Universitaria de Educación y Psicología -ASUNIVEP-. https://formacionasunivep.com/Vcice/files/libro%20intervencion%20en%20contextos%20clinicos.pdf#page=271
Gibson, A. S., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (2019). Toward a nuanced understanding of nondisclosure in psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000295
Gibson, J. A., Grey, I. M., & Hastings, R. P. (2009). Supervisor support as a predictor of burnout and therapeutic self-efficacy in therapists working in ABA schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0709-4
Goodyear, R. K., & Guzzardo, C. R. (2000). Psychotherapy supervision and training. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 83–108). New York, NY: Wiley.
Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Ancis, J. R. (2001). Psychotherapy trainees’ experience of counterproductive events in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 371–383– 383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.371
Hill, C., & Knox, S. Training and supervisión in psychotherapy, in Lambert, M. J. (2013). Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. John Wiley & Sons.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holloway, E. L. (2012). Professional competence in supervision. In J. N. Fuertes, A. Spokane, & E. L. Holloway (Eds.), The professional competencies in counseling psychology (pp. 165–181). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Inman, A.G., Hutman, H., Pendse, A., Devdas, L., Luu, L., & Ellis, M.V. (2014). Current trends concerning supervisors, supervisees, and clients in clinical supervision. In C. E. Watkins, Jr., & D. Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 61–102). Oxford, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846360.ch4
Inman, A.G., & Ladany, N. (2008). Research: The state of the field. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 500–517). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Kennedy, E. K., Keaney, C., Shaldon, C., & Canagaratnam, M. (2018). A relational model of supervision for applied psychology practice: professional growth through relating and reflecting. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(3), 282-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1456407
Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
Mehr, K. E., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you? Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733141003712301
Milne, D. L. (2017). Evidence-based CBT supervision: Principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Milne, D. L., Reiser, R. P., Cliffe, T., & Raine, R. (2011). SAGE: Preliminary evaluation of an instrument for observing competence in CBT supervision. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 4, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X11000079
Milne, D., Sheikh, A., Pattison, S., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Evidence-based training for clinical supervisors: A systematic review of 11 controlled studies. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.564955
Olk, M., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1037//00220167.39.3.389
Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 9(11), 8. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1144&context=pare
Palomo, M., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2010). Development and validation of the supervisory relationship questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466509X441033
Reiser, R.P., & Watkins, C.E. (2014). The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision. D. Milne (Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Revelle, W. (2014). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston. R package version, 1(1). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of statistical software, 48(2), 1-36. http://users.ugent.be/~yrosseel/lavaan/lavaanIntroduction.pdf
Scaturo, D.J., & Watkins, C.E. (2014). Supervising integrative and eclectic psychotherapies. In C. E. Watkins, & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 552–575). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Simon, D., Cruise, T., Huber, B., Swerdlik, M., & Newman, D. (2014). Supervision in school psychology: The developmental/ecological/problem-solving model. Psychology in the Schools, 51(6), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21772
Stoltenberg, C.D. (2005). Enhancing professional competence through developmental approaches to supervision. American Psychologist, 60(8), 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.8.85
Tangen, J.L., & Borders, L. D. (2016). The supervisory relationship: A conceptual and psychometric review of measures. Counselor Education & Supervision, 55(3), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12043
Watkins, C.E. (2011). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011. 619417
Watkins, C.E. (2012). Psychotherapy supervision in the new millennium: Competency-based, evidence-based, particularized, and energized. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-011-9202-4
Watkins, C.E., Jr. (2018, May 24). The Generic Model of Psychotherapy Supervision: An Analogized Research-Informing Meta-Theory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000114
Watkins, C.E. (2014). The supervisory alliance: A half century of theory, practice and research in critical perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 68, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2014.68.1.19
Wheeler, S., & Richards, K. (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counselors and therapists, their practice and their clients: A systematic review of the literature. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 7, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140601185274
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 CES Psicología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Revista CES Psicología ISSN 2011 3080
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad CES Primera edición 2008. Última actualización Mayo 18 de 2022. Todos los derechos reservados. Hecho el depósito legal que exige la ley.
Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de los artículos citando la fuente y el autor. This publication may be reproduced by mentioning the source and the authors.
| Estadísticas de artículo | |
|---|---|
| Vistas de resúmenes | |
| Vistas de PDF | |
| Descargas de PDF | |
| Vistas de HTML | |
| Otras vistas | |
