Comparison of blood pressure measured by oscillometric or invasive methods in sheep and goats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.6811Keywords:
anesthesia, monitoring, laparoscopy, small ruminantsAbstract
Blood pressure is an indispensable parameter in anesthetic monitoring. The measurement of invasive artery pressure (IBP) using peripheral arterial catheterization is reliable but requires experience and can lead to complications. The oscillometric technique is non-invasive (NIBP), it only requires a cuff over a peripheral artery and the measurement is automated. However, the accuracy of PANI has been little explored and, for this reason, this study aimed to compare this technique with PAI in sheep and goats. 20 sheep and 20 goats needed laparoscopy were used under general anesthesia. Once in anesthetic plane, the caudal auricular artery was catheterized and connected to an electronic pressure transducer, coupled to a multiparameter monitor to measure IBP, systolic (S), diastolic (D) and mean (M). At the same time, an appropriately sized cuff was placed over radial artery and connected to the same monitor. Every 5 minutes, blood pressures were recorded by both methods, subsequently compared by the Student test, correlated by Pearson and agreement assessed by the Bland-Altman. In sheep, DBP was similar and correlated between NIBP and IBP (P=0.69; r=0.65; bias 0.7 ± 13.1 mmHg), whereas SBP and MBP were overestimated by NIBP. In goats, MAP was similar and correlated between NIBP and IBP (P=0.566; r=0.57; bias 2.4 ± 20.2 mmHg), while SBP was overestimated and DBP underestimated. It is concluded that, in sheep only DBP and in goats, MBP, measured by the oscillometric method, are accurate, feasible and reliable alternatives for anesthetic monitoring of blood pressure.
Downloads
References
Grandy JL, Steffey EP, Hodgson DS, Woliner MJ. Arterial hypotension and the development of postanesthetic myopathy in halothane-anesthetized horses. Am J Vet Res., 1987; 48 (2): 192–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3826855/
Gaynor J, Dunlop C, Wagner A, Wertz E, Golden A, Demme W. Complications and mortality associated with anesthesia in dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc., 1999; 35 (1): 13–7. https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-35-1-13
Bijker JB, van Klei WA, Kappen TH, van Wolfswinkel L, Moons KGM, Kalkman CJ. Incidence of Intraoperative Hypotension as a Function of the Chosen Definition. Anesthesiology., 2007; 107 (2): 213–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000270724.40897.8e
Almeida D, Barletta M, Mathews L, Graham L, Quandt J. Comparison between invasive blood pressure and a non-invasive blood pressure monitor in anesthetized sheep. Res Vet Sci., 2014; 97 (3): 582–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.10.004
Brown SA, Henik RA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Systemic Hypertension. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract., 1998; 28 (6): 1481–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(98)50133-7
Kennedy MJ. Anesthetic Monitoring Basics. Em: Smith LJ, organizador. Questions and Answers in Small Animal Anesthesia [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015 [citado 22 de junho de 2022]. p. 107–18. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118912997.ch15
Ulian CMV, Carvajal APL, Velasquez DRB, Teixeira Neto FJ, Lourenço MLG, Chiacchio SB. Acurácia dos métodos oscilométrico (PETMAP®) e Doppler para aferição indireta da pressão arterial em cordeiros. Ciênc Anim Bras., 2016; 17 (4): 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v17i437301
Rodrigues JC, Teixeira Neto FJ, Campagnol D, Ozeki LM, Cândido TD. Avaliação da acurácia de um novo monitor oscilométrico desenvolvido para mensuração da pressão arterial em pacientes veterinários. Rev Educ Cont Med Vet Zootec., 2011; 9 (22): 26. https://www.revistamvez-crmvsp.com.br/index.php/recmvz/article/view/369
Aarnes TK, Hubbell JA, Lerche P, Bednarski RM. Comparison of invasive and oscillometric blood pressure measurement techniques in anesthetized sheep, goats, and cattle. Vet Anaesth Analg., 2014; 41 (2): 174–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12101
Szaluś-Jordanow O, Czopowicz M, Świerk A, Szpinda O, Garncarz M, Mickiewicz M, et al. Oscillometric and Doppler arterial blood pressure measurement in conscious goats. Can J Vet Res Rev Can Rech Veterinaire., 2018; 82 (4): 244–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168019/
Clarke KW, Hall LW, Trim CM. Veterinary anaesthesia. 11th ed. Edinburgh ; New York: Saunders/Elsevier; 2014. p.p. 6.
Teixeira PPM, Padilha LC, Oliveira MEF, Motheo TF, da Silva ASL, Barros FFPC, et al. Laparoscopic ovum collection in sheep: Gross and microscopic evaluation of the ovary and influence on ooctye production. Anim Reprod Sci., 2011; 127 (3–4): 169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.08.001
Anjos TM, Veado JCC, Castro MCN, Diniz SA, Rocha GSL, Silva EF, et al. Avaliação e comparação entre métodos de mensuração de pressão arterial sistólica em gatos hígidos anestesiados. Arq Bras Med Veterinária E Zootec., 2014; 66 (4): 1051–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6722
Acierno MJ, Seaton D, Mitchell MA, da Cunha A. Agreement between directly measured blood pressure and pressures obtained with three veterinary-specific oscillometric units in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc., 2010; 237 (4): 402–6. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.237.4.402
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
